| |
During
my (E.R.) three years of emergency medicine residency at Strong Memorial
Hospital in Rochester, NY, I spent two months working in the Neonatal
Intensive Care Unit (NICU). It was a profound learning experience
for me and an experience I hope I will never have to go through as
a parent. During those very long sleepless nights and days, where
my only distinction between night and day was when I arrived and left,
I had ample opportunity to observe highly trained specialists provide
medical care to the most helpless souls.
E.R. in the NICU
The NICU where I was stationed was a sprawling, surrealistic collage
of see-through isolettes, scales, ventilators, monitors, IVs, feeding
apparatus, and ‘procedure’ areas. All of them were bathed
in an eerie bluish fluorescent light. The hums and bells and alarms
of the machines provided a continuous dissonant electronic drone.
Las Vegas, this was not. In stark contrast to these “mechs”
were the huddled groups of bleary-eyed, sleep-deprived, confused
and humbled parents and visitors. They all wore hospital-issued
yellow gowns, head coverings, and booties, and they expressed pained
emotions through the clear plastic confines of their child’s
first out-of-womb home.
What did we, as emergency medicine residents, do in the NICU? For
the most part, we simply recorded things. We weighed and measured.
We counted drops of IV fluids being pumped into microscopically
small, translucent veins. We calculated numbers of calories, vitamins,
minerals, and medications based on weight, size, and age. We adjusted
numbers of breaths and concentration of oxygen being delivered through
breathing tubes and monitored the heartbeat, blood pressure, temperature,
and oxygenation. Aside from placing IVs and breathing tubes, that’s
all we really could do. The numbers, however, were very important.
They were the only objective evidence we had to guide us in the
care of these tiny, flaccid human beings.
Music in the NICU; CDs for Preemies?
There are many inherent difficulties in designing research studies
to assess the effects of music on the premature infant. There are
debates on the fundamental issues of whether the preemie needs additional
stimulation to promote weight gain, effective breathing, and brain
development, to name a few, or whether a quiet environment would
best channel the neonate’s minimal energy resources in the
right direction. And what is the right direction, and how can that
be measured? In grams, millimeters, or milliliters of breath? In
decibel of cry, cubic centimeters of urine output, integers of coordinated
limb movements? In amount of months, weeks, and days spent in the
NICU before ‘graduating’ to possibly another intensive
care unit? These parameters and others have been used by NICU specialists
to assess the effectiveness of their care. Mortality and morbidity
in the NICU has greatly improved during the past 20 years. Preemies
have a much greater chance of surviving and living normal lives
than ever before, and they are surviving from earlier ages. It seems
only natural that any modality which can be used to further these
successes should be explored. This has been the case with the use
of music as an adjunct therapy in the care of the neonate.
Are there scientific studies showing that music helps premature
infants?
It has been demonstrated that music played for neonates can increase
oxygenation, heart rate, and respiratory rate (1). Studies have
suggested that music stimulation may reduce initial weight loss,
boost daily average weight gain, increase caloric intake, improve
oxygen saturation, and reduce the length of the NICU and total hospital
stay (2,3). While these findings are positive, the experiments themselves
were small, and none of the studies reduced experimental bias by
being blinded and randomized. It would be extremely difficult to
design a meaningful study with premature infants in the NICU that
would eliminate all variables associated with the infant’s
environment and physical makeup and prove that music alone caused
a positive result.
What's in a number?
I recognize the above as a physician, but the musician in me understands
that numbers cannot entirely reflect the benefits of music in the
NICU. The real benefit to music is not necessarily in the direct
physiologic effects on the infant, which are probably minute compared
with medical interventions, but on the beneficial effects it might
have on the family and caregivers of that infant (4). As I described
initially, the NICU was not designed like Starbucks. It was not
designed for families to congregate, socialize and schmooze. Music,
the great art that it is, has the ability to replace alien mechanized
and electronic cacophony with familiar humanistic warmth. It can
sharpen the senses, improve concentration, and decrease irritability.
These statements are not necessarily based on hard science, but
most who have taken a long car ride without music can attest to
these assumptions. Music has been known to inspire and comfort.
In fact, some of the greatest music ever written was written by
composers facing their own personal health tragedies and may have
served as their own medicine (Beethoven, Mozart, Schubert, Mahler,
to name a few).
E.R.'s bottom line:
The real and immeasurable value of music in the NICU may lie in
its ability to enable stressed parents and caregivers to share the
very first positive experiences of life together with the newest
member or members of the family.
We at E.R. Music applaud the efforts of those researchers seeking
ways to help the premature infant and their families through music
and are grateful to readers who inform us about new research being
published involving music and the premature infant. We will review
the studies and incorporate them into this chapter. Please join
our mailing list if you would like to be informed of the latest
developments.
References
1) Cassidy, Standley, “ The Effect of Music Listening on
Physiological Responses of Premature Infants in the NICU,”
Journal of Music Therapy, XXXII (4), 1995, 208-227
2) Caine, “The Effects of Music on the Selected Stress Behaviors,
Weight, Caloric and Formula Intake, and Length of Stay of Premature
and Low Birth Weight Neonates in a Newborn Intensive Care Unit,”
Journal of Music Therapy, XXVIII(4), 180-192
3) Standley JM, Moore RS, “Therapeutic effects of music and
mother’s voice on premature infants,” Pediatric Nursing,
1995 Nov-Dec;21(6)509-512, 574
4) Kemper K, Martin K, et al, “Attitudes and expectations
about music therapy for premature infants among staff in a neonatal
intensive care unit,” Altern Ther Health Med. 2004 Mar-Apr;10(2):50-4
Copyright 2008, E.R. Music, LLC
|
|